<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 52 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24021</link>
    <description>On the extinction of a Hindu undivided family under the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975, coparcenary property is treated as held by members as tenants-in-common only where the personal law or custom governing the family gives the female member a legal right to claim partition or a share on partition. A wife&#039;s entitlement to a share is not automatic and depends on the applicable school of Hindu law or custom. The record here lacked findings on that governing law and on the wife&#039;s partition right, so the Tribunal proceeded on an incorrect assumption in limiting wealth-tax assessment to the assessee&#039;s presumptive share.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 52 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24021</link>
      <description>On the extinction of a Hindu undivided family under the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975, coparcenary property is treated as held by members as tenants-in-common only where the personal law or custom governing the family gives the female member a legal right to claim partition or a share on partition. A wife&#039;s entitlement to a share is not automatic and depends on the applicable school of Hindu law or custom. The record here lacked findings on that governing law and on the wife&#039;s partition right, so the Tribunal proceeded on an incorrect assumption in limiting wealth-tax assessment to the assessee&#039;s presumptive share.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>