<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (2) TMI 139 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292238</link>
    <description>The Civil Revision Petition was allowed as the application for restitution invoked the inherent powers of the Court, not subject to the limitation period under the Limitation Act. The petitioners were entitled to recover the balance amount with interest from the date of withdrawal by the plaintiff, limited to the liability of the plaintiff&#039;s legal representatives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:46:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (2) TMI 139 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292238</link>
      <description>The Civil Revision Petition was allowed as the application for restitution invoked the inherent powers of the Court, not subject to the limitation period under the Limitation Act. The petitioners were entitled to recover the balance amount with interest from the date of withdrawal by the plaintiff, limited to the liability of the plaintiff&#039;s legal representatives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>