https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292238 Restitution could be ordered under the court's inherent power in Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 where Section 144 did not strictly apply, because the money had been withdrawn through the court process and return was needed to restore the parties to their original position. An invocation of inherent jurisdiction was also held not to be an application under the Code for Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the motion was not time-barred on that basis. The petitioners were therefore entitled to recover the withdrawn amount with appropriate interest and costs. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:46:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292238 Restitution could be ordered under the court's inherent power in Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 where Section 144 did not strictly apply, because the money had been withdrawn through the court process and return was needed to restore the parties to their original position. An invocation of inherent jurisdiction was also held not to be an application under the Code for Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, so the motion was not time-barred on that basis. The petitioners were therefore entitled to recover the withdrawn amount with appropriate interest and costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292238