https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292237 The court allowed the condensation of delay in filing the appeal under Section 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. It excluded the period spent in pursuing a review application from the limitation period calculation. The court invoked Sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act, emphasizing the need for due diligence in prosecuting the review application. Despite the dismissal of the review application by the Deputy Registrar, the court found that the appellant had acted bona fide and diligently, justifying the exclusion of time under Section 14. Ultimately, the court granted the application for condensation of delay, deeming the appeal timely filed within the prescribed period. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292237 The court allowed the condensation of delay in filing the appeal under Section 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958. It excluded the period spent in pursuing a review application from the limitation period calculation. The court invoked Sections 5 and 14 of the Limitation Act, emphasizing the need for due diligence in prosecuting the review application. Despite the dismissal of the review application by the Deputy Registrar, the court found that the appellant had acted bona fide and diligently, justifying the exclusion of time under Section 14. Ultimately, the court granted the application for condensation of delay, deeming the appeal timely filed within the prescribed period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292237