https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292233 Rule 17 of the Employees' State Insurance Rules was held ultra vires because the State Government's power under Section 96(1)(b) extended only to procedure in pending proceedings, not to prescribing a limitation period for instituting original applications. The Court further held that no limitation applied to Corporation applications before 1 January 1964, as the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 contained no applicable period and Article 181 was confined to Code of Civil Procedure applications. From 1 January 1964, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 governed such applications, because no specific period was provided elsewhere in the Act. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:17:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292233 Rule 17 of the Employees' State Insurance Rules was held ultra vires because the State Government's power under Section 96(1)(b) extended only to procedure in pending proceedings, not to prescribing a limitation period for instituting original applications. The Court further held that no limitation applied to Corporation applications before 1 January 1964, as the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 contained no applicable period and Article 181 was confined to Code of Civil Procedure applications. From 1 January 1964, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 governed such applications, because no specific period was provided elsewhere in the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292233