<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules on Coal Transaction Discrepancies: Assessing Officer&#039;s Addition Justified, Calls for Supply Chain Accountability.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55881</link>
    <description>Addition made under the head claims, receivables, debts, shortages etc. written off - the coal is not an evaporated item, rather it is solid items for which, the quantity dispatched from the weighbridge at the loading point should be received with the same weight at the weighbridge of the destination point. As per our considered opinion and looking to the facts of the case, the assessee must have claimed to the responsible transporters which is lack in this case - The supplier of the coal is also government of India enterprises, therefore, there should not be any difference in the supply of coal. therefore, the ld. CIT(A) is not justified deleting the addition made by the AO. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:04:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:04:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules on Coal Transaction Discrepancies: Assessing Officer&#039;s Addition Justified, Calls for Supply Chain Accountability.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55881</link>
      <description>Addition made under the head claims, receivables, debts, shortages etc. written off - the coal is not an evaporated item, rather it is solid items for which, the quantity dispatched from the weighbridge at the loading point should be received with the same weight at the weighbridge of the destination point. As per our considered opinion and looking to the facts of the case, the assessee must have claimed to the responsible transporters which is lack in this case - The supplier of the coal is also government of India enterprises, therefore, there should not be any difference in the supply of coal. therefore, the ld. CIT(A) is not justified deleting the addition made by the AO. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 10:04:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>