https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401676 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging an order under the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the Petitioner failed to utilize the statutory appeal remedy provided under Section 35-B of the Act before resorting to the Writ Petition. The Court emphasized that Article 226 of the Constitution should not bypass statutory procedures unless extraordinary circumstances exist and discouraged the misuse of Writ Petitions for obtaining interim orders. The Petitioner's failure to follow the prescribed appeal mechanism led to the dismissal of the Writ Petition without costs. en-us Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401676 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging an order under the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the Petitioner failed to utilize the statutory appeal remedy provided under Section 35-B of the Act before resorting to the Writ Petition. The Court emphasized that Article 226 of the Constitution should not bypass statutory procedures unless extraordinary circumstances exist and discouraged the misuse of Writ Petitions for obtaining interim orders. The Petitioner's failure to follow the prescribed appeal mechanism led to the dismissal of the Writ Petition without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401676