<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 469 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12. It directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to exclude certain comparables, include others, and provide the benefit of the range of +/- 5% as per Section 92C(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The TPO was also instructed to re-compute the margins for certain comparables and consider the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the selection and rejection of comparable companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:55:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 469 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for both Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12. It directed the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to exclude certain comparables, include others, and provide the benefit of the range of +/- 5% as per Section 92C(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The TPO was also instructed to re-compute the margins for certain comparables and consider the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the selection and rejection of comparable companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>