<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 460 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Cybermate Infotek Ltd. from the list of comparables due to its mixed nature of operations and lack of segmental information. It emphasized the correct computation of the Profit Level Indicator (PLI) for Acropetal Technologies Ltd. and directed the adoption of the operating profit as per the DRP&#039;s directions. Additionally, the Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s exclusion of Comp-u-Learn Tech India Limited (CTIL) based on a new filter to be impermissible and directed its inclusion in the list of comparables. The matter was remitted to the AO for a fresh determination of the arm&#039;s length price, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:54:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 460 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the exclusion of Cybermate Infotek Ltd. from the list of comparables due to its mixed nature of operations and lack of segmental information. It emphasized the correct computation of the Profit Level Indicator (PLI) for Acropetal Technologies Ltd. and directed the adoption of the operating profit as per the DRP&#039;s directions. Additionally, the Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s exclusion of Comp-u-Learn Tech India Limited (CTIL) based on a new filter to be impermissible and directed its inclusion in the list of comparables. The matter was remitted to the AO for a fresh determination of the arm&#039;s length price, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>