<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 86 - SIKKIM High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24015</link>
    <description>Pre-merger Sikkim tax laws and notifications continued in force under Article 371F until amended or repealed, so the inherited income-tax regime remained enforceable. The 1987 tax collection statute was valid as a machinery provision, but recovery could proceed only through an Inspector appointed in the manner required by that Act; action by an unauthorised person was invalid. A transfer fee was not payable where no transfer certificate was applied for, and the modified scheme no longer supported a penal offence for transfer without a certificate. Best judgment assessments were sustained for unexplained amounts where accounts were withheld, but components made without notice, on mistaken facts, or without proper consideration were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 86 - SIKKIM High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24015</link>
      <description>Pre-merger Sikkim tax laws and notifications continued in force under Article 371F until amended or repealed, so the inherited income-tax regime remained enforceable. The 1987 tax collection statute was valid as a machinery provision, but recovery could proceed only through an Inspector appointed in the manner required by that Act; action by an unauthorised person was invalid. A transfer fee was not payable where no transfer certificate was applied for, and the modified scheme no longer supported a penal offence for transfer without a certificate. Best judgment assessments were sustained for unexplained amounts where accounts were withheld, but components made without notice, on mistaken facts, or without proper consideration were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>