<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to the 15% exemption under Section 11(1)(a) for accumulation. It confirmed that the deficit should be computed after allowing this deduction and permitted the carry forward of the deficit for set off in subsequent years. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the AO was directed to implement the benefits as determined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 447 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to the 15% exemption under Section 11(1)(a) for accumulation. It confirmed that the deficit should be computed after allowing this deduction and permitted the carry forward of the deficit for set off in subsequent years. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the AO was directed to implement the benefits as determined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>