<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 436 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the disallowance under Section 14A, read with Rule 8D, should be limited to the actual exempt income of Rs. 4,31,280 earned by the assessee. The Tribunal agreed that the assessee had sufficient own funds for the investments, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 436 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, confirming that the disallowance under Section 14A, read with Rule 8D, should be limited to the actual exempt income of Rs. 4,31,280 earned by the assessee. The Tribunal agreed that the assessee had sufficient own funds for the investments, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>