<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 426 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401627</link>
    <description>The appeal against the striking off of a company&#039;s name under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 was allowed by the Tribunal. The company provided evidence of being operational, including audited financial statements and relevant certificates. The Tribunal found the company to be operational and not defunct, declaring the striking off as illegal. The company&#039;s name was ordered to be restored upon fulfilling necessary requirements, including filing outstanding documents, payment of fees, and completion of formalities. The appeal was allowed, and directions were given to serve a copy of the order to the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2020 07:46:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 426 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401627</link>
      <description>The appeal against the striking off of a company&#039;s name under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 was allowed by the Tribunal. The company provided evidence of being operational, including audited financial statements and relevant certificates. The Tribunal found the company to be operational and not defunct, declaring the striking off as illegal. The company&#039;s name was ordered to be restored upon fulfilling necessary requirements, including filing outstanding documents, payment of fees, and completion of formalities. The appeal was allowed, and directions were given to serve a copy of the order to the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>