<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 419 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401620</link>
    <description>Cancellation of a shareholder&#039;s equity shares for alleged FEMA and FDI violations was invalid where regulatory clarification confirmed acquisition on a non-repatriation basis and no confiscation was ordered. The register of members was directed to be rectified to restore the shareholder&#039;s shares. Removal of the petitioners as directors for alleged non-attendance at board meetings was also invalid and oppressive, particularly after their shareholding had been reduced. Articles provisions entrenching the managing director&#039;s tenure, remuneration and privileges were deleted as oppressive. Other mismanagement allegations, including export obligations, remuneration and related-party transactions, lacked merit or involved business decisions in which the petitioners participated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 419 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401620</link>
      <description>Cancellation of a shareholder&#039;s equity shares for alleged FEMA and FDI violations was invalid where regulatory clarification confirmed acquisition on a non-repatriation basis and no confiscation was ordered. The register of members was directed to be rectified to restore the shareholder&#039;s shares. Removal of the petitioners as directors for alleged non-attendance at board meetings was also invalid and oppressive, particularly after their shareholding had been reduced. Articles provisions entrenching the managing director&#039;s tenure, remuneration and privileges were deleted as oppressive. Other mismanagement allegations, including export obligations, remuneration and related-party transactions, lacked merit or involved business decisions in which the petitioners participated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>