<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 402 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401603</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that banking companies are not liable for MAT under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, as previously determined in a prior judgment. Additionally, the Court held that the assessee bank is eligible for a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) for bad debts write-off, again referencing the previous case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 402 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401603</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that banking companies are not liable for MAT under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, as previously determined in a prior judgment. Additionally, the Court held that the assessee bank is eligible for a deduction under section 36(1)(vii) for bad debts write-off, again referencing the previous case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>