<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 399 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 45,000 while deleting the addition of Rs. 1,75,000 related to unexplained investments in electronic items. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2004-05 was confirmed but remanded for recomputation based on the sustained addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 399 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 45,000 while deleting the addition of Rs. 1,75,000 related to unexplained investments in electronic items. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2004-05 was confirmed but remanded for recomputation based on the sustained addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>