<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 396 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It concluded that gains from the investment portfolio should be classified as capital gains, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D to the amount of the exempt income earned, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=630007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 396 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It concluded that gains from the investment portfolio should be classified as capital gains, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal restricted the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D to the amount of the exempt income earned, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>