<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 82 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24001</link>
    <description>Deduction of discount on bonds was treated as a clear question of law, making it fit for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petition was confined to the first question because no ground was raised or pressed on the second question. On that basis, the High Court directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the specified question on the admissibility of deduction of discount on bonds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:20:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 82 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24001</link>
      <description>Deduction of discount on bonds was treated as a clear question of law, making it fit for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The petition was confined to the first question because no ground was raised or pressed on the second question. On that basis, the High Court directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the specified question on the admissibility of deduction of discount on bonds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>