<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 369 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401570</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the operational creditor, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor due to established debt and default. A moratorium was imposed under Section 14 of the Code to protect the Corporate Debtor, with an Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) appointed to oversee proceedings funded by the Operational Creditor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 369 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401570</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the operational creditor, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor due to established debt and default. A moratorium was imposed under Section 14 of the Code to protect the Corporate Debtor, with an Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) appointed to oversee proceedings funded by the Operational Creditor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>