<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 363 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401564</link>
    <description>The court held that under the Amnesty Scheme, all outstanding liabilities must be settled together, including those with pending appeals. Despite a favorable order for a specific assessment year, the Department&#039;s appeal must be considered. The petitioner was directed to include the liability for the disputed assessment year in the application, emphasizing the need to address all arrears and appeals comprehensively under the Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 363 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401564</link>
      <description>The court held that under the Amnesty Scheme, all outstanding liabilities must be settled together, including those with pending appeals. Despite a favorable order for a specific assessment year, the Department&#039;s appeal must be considered. The petitioner was directed to include the liability for the disputed assessment year in the application, emphasizing the need to address all arrears and appeals comprehensively under the Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>