<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 46 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23995</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of a partnership firm&#039;s deduction for salary paid to partners under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1974-75. The court clarified that sections 40(b) and 40A operate in different fields, with section 40 having precedence over other provisions for deductions. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the disallowance of the entire salary amount and denying any costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 46 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23995</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of a partnership firm&#039;s deduction for salary paid to partners under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1974-75. The court clarified that sections 40(b) and 40A operate in different fields, with section 40 having precedence over other provisions for deductions. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the disallowance of the entire salary amount and denying any costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>