<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292186</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal on 26th September 2012. The Tribunal held that invoking sections 14A/8D for disallowing interest and administrative expenses was incorrect. It found that the disallowance was unwarranted due to the smallness of expenditure and lack of proper application of mind by the authorities. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted, and a partial disallowance of 5% of exempt income was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:45:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292186</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal on 26th September 2012. The Tribunal held that invoking sections 14A/8D for disallowing interest and administrative expenses was incorrect. It found that the disallowance was unwarranted due to the smallness of expenditure and lack of proper application of mind by the authorities. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted, and a partial disallowance of 5% of exempt income was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>