<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (8) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292182</link>
    <description>A statutory authority has no inherent power of review, and where the governing enactment does not confer such power, an order rejecting a review application is not separately appealable. The Regional Transport Authority therefore could not review its own order, and no appeal lay from the rejection of review. Where a special statute prescribes a 30-day appeal period and contains no provision for condonation of delay, the appellate body cannot extend time on equitable grounds or treat a late appeal as within time. The Appellate Board accordingly lacked jurisdiction to entertain the time-barred appeal, and the impugned appellate order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 12:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (8) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292182</link>
      <description>A statutory authority has no inherent power of review, and where the governing enactment does not confer such power, an order rejecting a review application is not separately appealable. The Regional Transport Authority therefore could not review its own order, and no appeal lay from the rejection of review. Where a special statute prescribes a 30-day appeal period and contains no provision for condonation of delay, the appellate body cannot extend time on equitable grounds or treat a late appeal as within time. The Appellate Board accordingly lacked jurisdiction to entertain the time-barred appeal, and the impugned appellate order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>