<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 45 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23990</link>
    <description>The High Court directed that both appeals be heard together by the Tribunal to ensure a comprehensive and coherent decision, emphasizing the need to consider whether the case fell under section 271 of the Income-tax Act and if the assessee had concealed income impacting the limitation period. The High Court returned the unanswered questions in both references, instructing the Tribunal to render a fresh decision without being influenced by previous orders, with parties bearing their own costs, concluding the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 45 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23990</link>
      <description>The High Court directed that both appeals be heard together by the Tribunal to ensure a comprehensive and coherent decision, emphasizing the need to consider whether the case fell under section 271 of the Income-tax Act and if the assessee had concealed income impacting the limitation period. The High Court returned the unanswered questions in both references, instructing the Tribunal to render a fresh decision without being influenced by previous orders, with parties bearing their own costs, concluding the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>