<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 335 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned a 158-day delay in filing an appeal due to the appellant&#039;s health issues and physical disability, allowing the appeal to proceed. It further ruled that the CIT(Appeals) unjustifiably sustained an addition under section 69A after deleting it under section 68, as no new issues were discovered. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition under section 69A, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 335 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned a 158-day delay in filing an appeal due to the appellant&#039;s health issues and physical disability, allowing the appeal to proceed. It further ruled that the CIT(Appeals) unjustifiably sustained an addition under section 69A after deleting it under section 68, as no new issues were discovered. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition under section 69A, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>