<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 330 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401531</link>
    <description>The departmental appeal was not maintainable because the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular, which was binding on the Revenue. The exception for additions based on information from external law enforcement agencies did not apply because information from the Income-tax Investigation Wing was not treated as information from an external law enforcement agency. The appeal was therefore barred by the low tax effect threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 330 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401531</link>
      <description>The departmental appeal was not maintainable because the tax effect was below the revised monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular, which was binding on the Revenue. The exception for additions based on information from external law enforcement agencies did not apply because information from the Income-tax Investigation Wing was not treated as information from an external law enforcement agency. The appeal was therefore barred by the low tax effect threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>