<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 313 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401514</link>
    <description>A cheque issued as security, rather than towards a legally enforceable debt, cannot sustain liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act when the underlying amount is shown to be unrecoverable. The accused&#039;s admission of execution triggered the statutory presumptions, but evidence of a prior civil finding that the claim was not proved, together with proof that the cheque formed part of the same disputed transaction, established a probable defence and rebutted those presumptions. As the complainant did not discharge the burden thereafter, the conviction and sentence were set aside and the accused was acquitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:20:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 313 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401514</link>
      <description>A cheque issued as security, rather than towards a legally enforceable debt, cannot sustain liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act when the underlying amount is shown to be unrecoverable. The accused&#039;s admission of execution triggered the statutory presumptions, but evidence of a prior civil finding that the claim was not proved, together with proof that the cheque formed part of the same disputed transaction, established a probable defence and rebutted those presumptions. As the complainant did not discharge the burden thereafter, the conviction and sentence were set aside and the accused was acquitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>