https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292174 The Tribunal remitted the issues back to the AO for review based on the appellant's claim for assessment on peak credit, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. The appellant's counsel agreed to be taxed on the basis of peak credit for both the unexplained contract receipt and the gift received from the father, leading to the Tribunal remitting these issues to the AO for reassessment based on peak credit computation. The appellant's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision pronounced on 07.08.2014. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 05:25:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292174 The Tribunal remitted the issues back to the AO for review based on the appellant's claim for assessment on peak credit, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. The appellant's counsel agreed to be taxed on the basis of peak credit for both the unexplained contract receipt and the gift received from the father, leading to the Tribunal remitting these issues to the AO for reassessment based on peak credit computation. The appellant's appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the decision pronounced on 07.08.2014. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292174