<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1518 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2006-07, denied the deduction u/s.10B for the assessee&#039;s activities not qualifying as manufacturing, and found the assessee did not meet conditions for deduction u/s.10B(2)(ii) &amp;amp; (iii). The Tribunal dismissed appeals for A.Y. 2008-09 to 2011-12, affirming the denial of deduction u/s.10B, and vacated the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to reopen assessments for A.Y. 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2007-08.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 05:25:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1518 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2006-07, denied the deduction u/s.10B for the assessee&#039;s activities not qualifying as manufacturing, and found the assessee did not meet conditions for deduction u/s.10B(2)(ii) &amp;amp; (iii). The Tribunal dismissed appeals for A.Y. 2008-09 to 2011-12, affirming the denial of deduction u/s.10B, and vacated the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to reopen assessments for A.Y. 2003-04, 2004-05, and 2007-08.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>