<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 77 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23985</link>
    <description>A reference on the tax treatment of agricultural land and an alleged family settlement could not be answered until the Tribunal first determined the land&#039;s character before the land reforms regime and the factual basis of any genuine settlement. The Tribunal had applied Hindu law principles on severance of status without examining the statutory framework governing rights in agricultural land, and the document relied on as a settlement was in fact a plaint in a partition suit. Because the essential factual foundations were not established, the court declined to answer the reference on merits and remitted the matter for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 77 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23985</link>
      <description>A reference on the tax treatment of agricultural land and an alleged family settlement could not be answered until the Tribunal first determined the land&#039;s character before the land reforms regime and the factual basis of any genuine settlement. The Tribunal had applied Hindu law principles on severance of status without examining the statutory framework governing rights in agricultural land, and the document relied on as a settlement was in fact a plaint in a partition suit. Because the essential factual foundations were not established, the court declined to answer the reference on merits and remitted the matter for fresh disposal in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>