<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 310 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401511</link>
    <description>Bail in a GST prosecution was refused on a third application where allegations concerned creation of multiple firms for wrongful availment and utilisation of input tax credit. The Court considered the opposition of the Union of India and found no basis to entertain the renewed request for bail. Relief was therefore declined to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 310 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401511</link>
      <description>Bail in a GST prosecution was refused on a third application where allegations concerned creation of multiple firms for wrongful availment and utilisation of input tax credit. The Court considered the opposition of the Union of India and found no basis to entertain the renewed request for bail. Relief was therefore declined to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>