https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23981 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the search and seizure under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, stating the lack of credible information for the authorization. Although the search was deemed illegal, evidence obtained could still be used in proceedings. As proceedings continued against the husband, the seized assets were retained for his case. Consequently, the court ruled against returning the valuables and documents to the petitioner, dismissing the writ petition with no costs. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:46:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23981 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the search and seizure under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, stating the lack of credible information for the authorization. Although the search was deemed illegal, evidence obtained could still be used in proceedings. As proceedings continued against the husband, the seized assets were retained for his case. Consequently, the court ruled against returning the valuables and documents to the petitioner, dismissing the writ petition with no costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 18 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23981