<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 293 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to restrict additions to the estimated profit from unverified purchases, based on the gross profit rates declared by the assessee and upheld in previous Tribunal decisions. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed for all assessment years (A.Y. 2009-10, A.Y. 2011-12, A.Y. 2012-13, and A.Y. 2013-14), with the Tribunal finding the methodology for estimating profit to be logical and fair.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 293 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to restrict additions to the estimated profit from unverified purchases, based on the gross profit rates declared by the assessee and upheld in previous Tribunal decisions. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed for all assessment years (A.Y. 2009-10, A.Y. 2011-12, A.Y. 2012-13, and A.Y. 2013-14), with the Tribunal finding the methodology for estimating profit to be logical and fair.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>