https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401492 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on various issues, including the treatment of demarcation/survey expenses as revenue expenditure, salaries paid to Department of Urban Estates employees, contribution to Delhi Metro, and sale tax paid, all in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, citing lack of new arguments and previous rulings supporting the assessee's positions. Additionally, the Tribunal found no merit in the general grounds raised by the Revenue and upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on all major issues, concluding the matter on 21.10.2020. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2020 11:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401492 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on various issues, including the treatment of demarcation/survey expenses as revenue expenditure, salaries paid to Department of Urban Estates employees, contribution to Delhi Metro, and sale tax paid, all in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, citing lack of new arguments and previous rulings supporting the assessee's positions. Additionally, the Tribunal found no merit in the general grounds raised by the Revenue and upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions on all major issues, concluding the matter on 21.10.2020. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401492