<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 74 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23980</link>
    <description>Questions on valuation of a let-out property were treated as legal issues, but they were already settled by the Supreme Court in the assessee&#039;s own case. The settled principle was that, where the rental method is applied, valuation must be based on standard rent. In light of that binding position, the proposed questions did not warrant further reference to the High Court, and the reference request was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 74 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23980</link>
      <description>Questions on valuation of a let-out property were treated as legal issues, but they were already settled by the Supreme Court in the assessee&#039;s own case. The settled principle was that, where the rental method is applied, valuation must be based on standard rent. In light of that binding position, the proposed questions did not warrant further reference to the High Court, and the reference request was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>