<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 286 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401487</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) sanctioned the Scheme of Merger between the Transferor and Transferee Companies under the Companies Act, 2013, following compliance with all statutory requirements. The Tribunal directed the transfer of assets, liabilities, employees, and proceedings to facilitate the merger&#039;s implementation. The Transferee Company agreed to address compliance issues related to fees for enhanced authorized capital. No objections were raised by statutory authorities, and the Competition Commission of India&#039;s approval was deemed unnecessary due to exemptions. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to all legal obligations, ensuring a seamless transition and compliance with the merger&#039;s terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 286 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401487</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) sanctioned the Scheme of Merger between the Transferor and Transferee Companies under the Companies Act, 2013, following compliance with all statutory requirements. The Tribunal directed the transfer of assets, liabilities, employees, and proceedings to facilitate the merger&#039;s implementation. The Transferee Company agreed to address compliance issues related to fees for enhanced authorized capital. No objections were raised by statutory authorities, and the Competition Commission of India&#039;s approval was deemed unnecessary due to exemptions. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to all legal obligations, ensuring a seamless transition and compliance with the merger&#039;s terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>