<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 42 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23978</link>
    <description>Limitation for reassessment under the Income-tax Act is computed from the date of issuance of notice under section 148, not from the date of service on the assessee. A notice issued within the prescribed period remains valid even if served after limitation expires. The Tribunal was therefore wrong in treating the reassessment as time-barred solely because service occurred late, and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:39:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 42 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23978</link>
      <description>Limitation for reassessment under the Income-tax Act is computed from the date of issuance of notice under section 148, not from the date of service on the assessee. A notice issued within the prescribed period remains valid even if served after limitation expires. The Tribunal was therefore wrong in treating the reassessment as time-barred solely because service occurred late, and the issue was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>