<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 274 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HIMACHAL PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401475</link>
    <description>An advance ruling application under the CGST Act and the Himachal Pradesh GST Act must be accompanied by the prescribed fee under both heads. Where the full requisite fee was not paid, the statutory filing requirement for maintainability was not satisfied, and the application was liable to be rejected at the threshold. Non-payment of the complete fee therefore prevented the application from being entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 274 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, HIMACHAL PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401475</link>
      <description>An advance ruling application under the CGST Act and the Himachal Pradesh GST Act must be accompanied by the prescribed fee under both heads. Where the full requisite fee was not paid, the statutory filing requirement for maintainability was not satisfied, and the application was liable to be rejected at the threshold. Non-payment of the complete fee therefore prevented the application from being entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>