<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 255 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401456</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the reopening proceedings under Section 148, as the Assessing Officer did not independently verify the information and relied on borrowed information. This led to the appeals being allowed in favor of the assessees, rendering other grounds on the merits of the case moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 11:29:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 255 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401456</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the reopening proceedings under Section 148, as the Assessing Officer did not independently verify the information and relied on borrowed information. This led to the appeals being allowed in favor of the assessees, rendering other grounds on the merits of the case moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>