<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 247 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401448</link>
    <description>An approved resolution plan under insolvency law binds stakeholders and extinguishes pre-plan electricity dues, so a distribution company cannot pursue post-approval recovery for those liabilities. However, the plan does not override independent statutory conditions governing fresh or restored electricity supply; a lawful security deposit may still be required for restoration of a high-tension connection. The insolvency framework gives the corporate debtor a fresh start, but it does not permit bypassing applicable electricity-law requirements for supply restoration. Accordingly, the pre-plan dues claim was disallowed, while the insistence on fresh security deposit for restoration was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 11:03:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 247 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401448</link>
      <description>An approved resolution plan under insolvency law binds stakeholders and extinguishes pre-plan electricity dues, so a distribution company cannot pursue post-approval recovery for those liabilities. However, the plan does not override independent statutory conditions governing fresh or restored electricity supply; a lawful security deposit may still be required for restoration of a high-tension connection. The insolvency framework gives the corporate debtor a fresh start, but it does not permit bypassing applicable electricity-law requirements for supply restoration. Accordingly, the pre-plan dues claim was disallowed, while the insistence on fresh security deposit for restoration was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>