<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1149 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292152</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee for the A.Y 2014-15, holding that no adjustment was necessary regarding interest on receivables from associated enterprises. The Tribunal supported its decision by applying the TNMM method, comparing industry standards for receivables delay, and relying on previous Tribunal decisions. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:38:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1149 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292152</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee for the A.Y 2014-15, holding that no adjustment was necessary regarding interest on receivables from associated enterprises. The Tribunal supported its decision by applying the TNMM method, comparing industry standards for receivables delay, and relying on previous Tribunal decisions. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>