<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 236 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal confirmed that the assessee had satisfactorily proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions related to share application money. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed that the addition on account of income from undisclosed sources represented double taxation and was unjustified, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 236 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal confirmed that the assessee had satisfactorily proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions related to share application money. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed that the addition on account of income from undisclosed sources represented double taxation and was unjustified, leading to the deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>