<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1607 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions totaling millions of rupees and related interest. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of thorough investigation and criticized the reliance on retracted statements without supporting evidence. The assessee successfully demonstrated the legitimacy of transactions by providing extensive documentary evidence, including bank statements and confirmations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1607 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions totaling millions of rupees and related interest. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of thorough investigation and criticized the reliance on retracted statements without supporting evidence. The assessee successfully demonstrated the legitimacy of transactions by providing extensive documentary evidence, including bank statements and confirmations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>