<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1616 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292121</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for all the assessment years involved and allowed the cross-objections filed by the assessees. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed unjustified as they were based on an erroneous admission by Capt. R.S. Sindhu and the unexplained cash found during the search was satisfactorily explained by the family members.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1616 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292121</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for all the assessment years involved and allowed the cross-objections filed by the assessees. The additions made by the Assessing Officer were deemed unjustified as they were based on an erroneous admission by Capt. R.S. Sindhu and the unexplained cash found during the search was satisfactorily explained by the family members.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>