<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292140</link>
    <description>The Court granted an extension of 50 days in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The decision aimed to provide a final opportunity for resolution for the Corporate Debtor, M/s. Alpine Realtech Private Limited, considering the exceptional circumstances, time consumed in unavoidable litigation, and the potential for resolution. The judgment emphasized the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority to extend the CIRP period in cases where delays were not attributable to the litigants, aligning with principles outlined in a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1390 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292140</link>
      <description>The Court granted an extension of 50 days in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The decision aimed to provide a final opportunity for resolution for the Corporate Debtor, M/s. Alpine Realtech Private Limited, considering the exceptional circumstances, time consumed in unavoidable litigation, and the potential for resolution. The judgment emphasized the discretion of the Adjudicating Authority to extend the CIRP period in cases where delays were not attributable to the litigants, aligning with principles outlined in a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>