<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1389 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deleted the upward adjustment of Rs. 2,78,02,502 made by the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer, finding the TNMM applied by the assessee as the most appropriate method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price due to significant differences in economic circumstances and contractual terms. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1389 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deleted the upward adjustment of Rs. 2,78,02,502 made by the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer, finding the TNMM applied by the assessee as the most appropriate method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price due to significant differences in economic circumstances and contractual terms. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>