<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1583 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292143</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT (A) and ITAT&#039;s decisions. On the first issue, the court upheld the addition of Rs. 1 lac under Section 16(8), finding the identity and genuineness of creditors substantiated. On the second issue, the disallowance of interest was reduced to Rs. 3.69 lacs, with no legal questions arising.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1583 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292143</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the CIT (A) and ITAT&#039;s decisions. On the first issue, the court upheld the addition of Rs. 1 lac under Section 16(8), finding the identity and genuineness of creditors substantiated. On the second issue, the disallowance of interest was reduced to Rs. 3.69 lacs, with no legal questions arising.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>