https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292146 A commercial power purchase agreement was construed by its express tariff language, requiring monthly energy charges to reflect the actual cost of coal purchased, transported and unloaded at the project site. Washing costs, washing-related loss, and necessary road transportation were included because the contract contemplated usable coal delivered to the project. Gross calorific value was also to be measured at the project site, not the mine end, as the tariff formula linked the charge to coal supplied to and at the project. Ancillary claims for transit and handling losses, third-party testing charges, liaising charges, and interest were rejected as outside the contractual formula. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Dec 2022 15:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292146 A commercial power purchase agreement was construed by its express tariff language, requiring monthly energy charges to reflect the actual cost of coal purchased, transported and unloaded at the project site. Washing costs, washing-related loss, and necessary road transportation were included because the contract contemplated usable coal delivered to the project. Gross calorific value was also to be measured at the project site, not the mine end, as the tariff formula linked the charge to coal supplied to and at the project. Ancillary claims for transit and handling losses, third-party testing charges, liaising charges, and interest were rejected as outside the contractual formula. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292146