https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292105 Joinder of multiple causes of action is permissible only where the court has jurisdiction over each cause of action. The agency claim was not shown to have arisen at Tellicherry, and the contract was presumed to have been made and performed at Bombay, so the court lacked jurisdiction over that claim independently of its joinder with the partnership claim. Where a plaint combines causes triable by different courts, the proper course is return of the plaint with the appropriate endorsement rather than dismissal. The plaint should therefore be returned for presentation to the proper court. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 1883 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:00:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292105 Joinder of multiple causes of action is permissible only where the court has jurisdiction over each cause of action. The agency claim was not shown to have arisen at Tellicherry, and the contract was presumed to have been made and performed at Bombay, so the court lacked jurisdiction over that claim independently of its joinder with the partnership claim. Where a plaint combines causes triable by different courts, the proper course is return of the plaint with the appropriate endorsement rather than dismissal. The plaint should therefore be returned for presentation to the proper court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Sep 1883 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292105