https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292103 The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the NCDRC, State Commission, and District Forum, which had favored the respondent by interpreting "burglary" to include theft without force or violence. The SC upheld the appellant's repudiation of the insurance claim, emphasizing the necessity of force and violence as per the policy. However, the SC decided not to recover the compensation already paid to the respondent on equitable grounds. No order as to costs was made. en-us Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2024 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292103 The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the NCDRC, State Commission, and District Forum, which had favored the respondent by interpreting "burglary" to include theft without force or violence. The SC upheld the appellant's repudiation of the insurance claim, emphasizing the necessity of force and violence as per the policy. However, the SC decided not to recover the compensation already paid to the respondent on equitable grounds. No order as to costs was made. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292103