<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 223 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 92.50 crores made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that since the transactions involved an exchange of shares without any cash inflow, Section 68 was not applicable. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 03.12.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:53:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=629576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 223 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 92.50 crores made by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that since the transactions involved an exchange of shares without any cash inflow, Section 68 was not applicable. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 03.12.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=401424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>